How could cross-curricular learning potentially impact on primary education?
We’re getting there, first term near
enough done and Christmas is nearly here!
So, what is meant by cross curricular learning?
Barnes (2015, p.11) states “When the skills, knowledge
and attitudes of a number of different disciplines are applied to a single
experience, problem, question, theme or idea, we are working in a
cross-curricular way.”
Hayes (2010, p.382) defines
cross-curricular as the “emphasise how combinations of subjects are used within
project or thematic work, incorporating a wide range of sources, related
concepts and flexible schedules.”
In Successful Futures, Donaldson (2015) views
cross-curricular learning as teaching literacy, numeracy and digital competence
in all areas of learning and experience by making links, applying knowledge and
using different skills to solve problems.
So, what happens if we don’t teach in a cross curricular
way? We stay as subject centred.
Lady Plowden (1967, p555) thought that “Throughout
our discussion of curriculum we stress that children’s learning does not fit
into subject categories”
therefore, it is important that pupils are taught in a cross-curricular way as Barnes (2011) expresses how it is more than likely that the children of out future generation will experience a totally different world than we do today. Also, Donaldson (2015) thinks that cross-curricular learning is more up to date and the current curriculum and assessments process isn't making any improvements to education. There are many benefits to cross-curricular learning as The Scottish Government (2008) suggest that it allows pupils and teachers to make links within their learning and it is based on the pupils' interests. When learning is put into a topic that is engaging and suitable to the pupil then it has been seen to boost the learners' participation and they become ambitious about what they are learning (QCA et al. 2005. cited in Kelly & Stead, 2013). Muijs and Reynolds (2011) again cited in Kelly and Stead (2013) talks about how cross-curricular learning enables the pupil to build on their independence whilst using a child-centred approach to the subject. This can relate to Kerry (2015) as he tells us that cross-curricular can meet the needs of the child by relating it to the learner and their interests, making it more fun, interesting and it can test their ability. Lastly, it can lead to an improvement in motivation (Barnes, 2011).
However, Fuchsman (2009) claims that cross-curricular learning is poor and not meaningful to the learner compared to when it is subject-centred. Many teachers are afraid to adapt their teaching into a cross-curricular way as there has been a tradition of subject-centred teaching. Teachers don't want to change from what they already know, they will have to adapt their teaching style quickly. Also, Driscoll et al. (2012, p.248) states that "Subject progression is difficult to achieve, even when only two subjects are involved; it is almost impossible with three or more." Another issue would be exams and assessments; these will become difficult when teachers need to set aims and objectives, learner will be assessed in a different way to how they are taught but this mainly applies in secondary school.
In order for cross-curricular learning to be successful effective planning must be in place as Barnes (2011, p.258) states "Experiences cannot be generative of new learning without interpreting them through the skills and subject knowledge of the disciplines." Teachers need to become more a facilitator rather than a teacher as Pollard (2010) thinks that teachers should be involved in the pupils learning, they should be working alongside the pupils. Although, teachers need to ensure they have an understanding of the subject because if they don't understand what the subject is all about and how to develop in this the the skills or the problems won't be achievable for the child (Barnes, 2011).
Whilst I have been volunteering in a local primary school, I haven't seen an cross-curricular learning take place with the classroom. I do think that cross-curricular learning will show a new light to learning as it gets rid of the old traditional style of teaching, it has been seen to have many benefits to the learner not only on their educational achievement but on their personal and social development. Hopefully, within the future I will get to experience this and put it into practice myself. However, if cross-curricular doesn't work in the way that is expected, I do fear that the curriculum will go through another reform all over again. if this does happen then what should be remembered is that school should prepare leaners for the real world.
References:
Barnes, J. (2011). Cross-curricular learning 3-14 (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, [Calif.] ; London: SAGE.
P.258
Barnes, J.
(2015) Cross-Curricular Learning 3-14.
3rd edn. London: SAGE. P. 11
Donaldson, G. (2015) Successful
Futures: Independent Review of Curriculum and Assessment arrangements in
Wales. Welsh Government.
Driscoll, P.,
Lambirth, A. & Roden, J. (2012). The
Primary Curriculum: A Creative Approach, London: SAGE. P.248.
Fuschman, S.
(2009). ‘Re-thinking integration in integrated studies’. Issues in Integration
Studies. 27: 70-85.
Hayes, D. (2010) ‘The seductive charms
of a cross-curricular approach’, Education
3-13, 38(4), p.382. available at: http://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.cardiffmet.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/03004270903519238#aHR0cDovL3d3dy10YW5kZm9ubGluZS1jb20uZXpwcm94eS5jYXJkaWZmbWV0LmFjLnVrL2RvaS9wZGYvMTAuMTA4MC8wMzAwNDI3MDkwMzUxOTIzOD9uZWVkQWNjZXNzPXRydWVAQEAw [Accessed: 19/11/17]
Kelly, L. & Stead, D. (2013) Enhancing Primary Science: Developing Effective Cross-Curricular Links.
England: Open University Press.
Kerry, T. (2015). Cross-curricular
teaching in the primary school: Planning and facilitating imaginative lessons
(Second ed.). London; New York: Routledge.
Plowden, Lady
Bridget. (1967). Children and Their Primary schools: A report of the Central
Advisory Council for Education, Volume 1. London: HMSO. P.555
Pollard, A. (ed.) (2010). Professionalism and
Pedagogy: A contemporary Opportunity: A commentary by TLRP and GTCE.
London: TLRP.
The Scottish Government. (2008) Curriculum for excellence building the
curriculum 3: framework for learning and teaching. Scottish Government.
Nice work Hannah!
ReplyDeleteLooks like you have done a lot of research into this particular topic.
Do you think that cross-curricular learning will be seen more in class rooms when the new curriculum Successful Futures will be implemented? . (Donaldson, 2015)
I think the 6 area's of learning will allow teachers to combine subjects much more effectively and they will be able to encourage children to use multiple skills while learning.
Reference - Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales. Welsh Government
Thank you Hollie,
ReplyDeleteI do think cross-curricular learning will be seen more in classrooms when the new curriculum is implemented but I do think there will be teachers out there who are afraid to try it.
Hannah, this blog was very well researched and extremely interesting to read. I personally agree with your view that the new curriculum 'Successful Futures', will allow both the practitioner and learner to benefit from the ideology of cross-curricular learning. By moving away from the traditional subject-based approach will encourage the pupils to make connections with real-life experiences and allow them to effectively transfer their skills to solve problems (Donaldson, 2015).
ReplyDeleteYou have mentioned that whilst volunteering, you have not seen any cross-curricular teaching or learning taking place, I have had similar experiences whilst volunteering myself. Looking at my own blog, it discusses that some teachers find it difficult and time consuming to plan for a cross-curricular lesson, possibly leading to another explanation as to why it is not commonly seen in primary education yet (Westwood, 2006). However, I also discuss that Donaldson (2015) argues the new curriculum will support a cross-curricular ideology and will aim to make it an easy transition for the teachers. Do you think this will make an impact? Or do you believe that teachers may be 'stuck in their ways' and take a much longer time to adapt their pedagogy?