HOW COULD CROSS CURRICULAR LEARNING IMPACT PRIMARY EDUCATION? Beth Gibbs
4th
Blog!
The importance
of cross curricular learning is going to be explored as well as what impact it
has on education.
Education
within primary schools is moving away from rigidly teaching children just one
subject at a time. Plowden (1967), believes that children do not think or learn
just one thing at a time. So teaching this way is ineffective, we need to have
a more holistic approach to teaching children as they naturally think in a
natural way. This is why Donaldson (2015) has put such an emphasis on cross-curricular
learning. Cross-curricular is a way of making sure that when children take part
in a learning exercise they are receiving multiple learning outcomes. An
example of this is by adapting a digital competency activity to also help
develop other skills such as numeracy. This could be using tablets and
computers to research Roman Numerals and then answering mathematical equations
by writing it in text book, which would also help develop their literacy and
fine motor skills. Already, this one activity, could be linked to four learning
outcomes. According to Barnes (2011), children experience the world in different
ways and cross curricular approaches will extend this further. Children will no
longer have rigid, one lesson, subjects so their learning experiences will never
be exactly alike. This approach could also promote more independent thinkers.
Education
is constantly changing because so are we, there are new pieces of research and
technology coming to light and being developed, every day. However we do not
know what will happen 10 or 20 years from now (Barnes,
2011), so we must prepare learners for an uncertain future. The only thing we
can be certain of is that technology is going to continue to develop so
Donaldson, putting an emphasis on digital competence was a good idea. It is not
just children that need to develop digital competency but teachers need to
constantly adapt and update their pedagogy so that what we teach children is still
relevant. Another good reason to stay current with technology is because we
could potentially use them as tools to help extend children’s knowledge and
learning.
‘Schools
need to embrace cross curricular learning, and move away from reform that
positions subjects in ways that hark back to some imagined past, rather than forwards to more globalised times’
(Power, 2002, p. 103).
I agree with Power (2002) because as technology develops, it may
cause a lack of jobs for ‘humans’ in the future and favour AI’s and robots. So teachers
may need to be able to show learners how to fix or develop the technology
themselves because just knowing how to use something may not be enough anymore
or at least in the future. I am in favour of Donaldson’s cross curricular
approach to education because it encourages group, experiential learning. This
then gives children the opportunity to collaborate with their group and to
think creatively so they can solve problems and tasks. Kerry (2015), suggests
that children need an enabling environment to explore areas of learning as it
will be more challenging and engaging, According to Meggitt and Bruce (2015),
when children are engaged and having fun they are more likely to retain
information and have a more effective learning experience.
Surely, the benefits of having a cross curricula teaching and
learning approach outweighs the standardised and rigid curriculum, where you as
a teacher and student have very little autonomy over your pedagogy. So why are
we not already utilising this approach already? I imagine in secondary school
it is more difficult to take a step back from separate subjects as there may be
timetabling issues. Also, some schools have specialist staff who work with
children that have special educational needs, where they are taken out of class
to do reading. This may be less disruptive if they are only missing 10 minutes
of one subject. However, if we were following Donaldson’s cross-curricular
approach then that child may miss ten minutes of several learning outcomes!
Reference List:
Barnes, J. (2011). Cross-curricular learning 3-14 (2nd ed.). Los
Angeles, [Calif.] ; London: SAGE.
Donaldson,
G. (2015) Successful Futures: Independent
Review of Curriculum and Assessment Arrangements in Wales. London: Crown
Copyright.
Kerry, T. (2015). Cross-curricular Teaching in the Primary School :
Planning and facilitating imaginative lessons (Second ed.). London; New York: Routledge.
Meggitt, C. and Bruce, T. (2015). Childcare and Education: Early Years Educator. London: Hodder Education
Plowden, Lady Bridget. (1967). Children and Their Primary schools: A
report of the Central Advisory Council for Education, Volume 1. London:
HMSO.

Comments
Post a Comment